Why follow the royal rule?
pp. 1565-1590
Abstract
This note is a sequel to Huber (Synthese 191:2167–2193, 2014). It is shown that obeying a normative principle relating counterfactual conditionals and conditional beliefs, viz. the royal rule, is a necessary and sufficient means to attaining a cognitive end that relates true beliefs in purely factual, non-modal propositions and true beliefs in purely modal propositions. Along the way I will sketch my idealism about alethic or metaphysical modality.
Publication details
Published in:
Dutant Julien, Fassio Davide, Meylan Anne (2017) Truth & epistemic norms. Synthese 194 (5).
Pages: 1565-1590
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-1004-x
Full citation:
Huber Franz (2017) „Why follow the royal rule?“. Synthese 194 (5), 1565–1590.