Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Series | Book | Chapter

200868

History, the sciences, and uniqueness

Ramona Cormier

pp. 1-16

Abstract

In our universities, separate departments of history and of the various sciences attest in practice to the distinction between history and the sciences.1 The ease with which practice appears to distinguish disciplines is not readily transferred to the delineating of theoretical differences. Generally, theoretical differentiations have been drawn from two major philosophical positions. One view, usually that of philosophical idealism, maintains that differences are found in the objects and the methods of the study. The other view does not admit these distinctions and suggests that differences lie with the objectives of the researcher.

Publication details

Published in:

Cormier Ramona, Feibleman James K., Lee Harold N., Sallis John, Weiss Donald H. (1969) Epistemology II. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 1-16

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-3197-4_1

Full citation:

Cormier Ramona (1969) History, the sciences, and uniqueness, In: Epistemology II, Dordrecht, Springer, 1–16.