B 132 revisited
pp. 288-294
Abstract
The philosophic insight of this for the transcendental deduction rather important point is obscured by the psychological, or semi-psychological, language in which it is expressed. The word "representation" (Vorstellung) belongs to the psychologist's vocabulary rather than to the philosopher's. And how are we, in this context, to understand the crucial expression "I think"? The fact that, in Kant's words, it must be possible to accompany all my representations implies that it is a psychological occurrence.
Publication details
Published in:
White Beck Lewis (1972) Proceedings of the Third international Kant congress: held at the university of rochester, march 30–april 4, 1970. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 288-294
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-3099-1_24
Full citation:
Hartnack Justus (1972) „B 132 revisited“, In: L. White Beck (ed.), Proceedings of the Third international Kant congress, Dordrecht, Springer, 288–294.