Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Journal | Volume | Article

174601

"To be" o "esse"? La questione dell'essere nel tomismo analitico

Giovanni Ventimiglia

pp. 23-54

Abstract

An overview of current scholarship in ontology places one before two parallel lines that never meet: on the one hand there are essays in so-called “analytic ontology”, on the other hand, there are studies developed within so-called Aristotelian-Thomistic ontology. However, even though it is frequently ignored, there is an interesting philosophical current of thought within so-called “analytical Thomism”, which joins contemporary debates of “analytic ontology” from the perspective of an Aristotelian-Thomistic ontology. The main contributors to this current are P. Geach and B. Miller, who have proposed a new theory about existence, called “two sense theory”. It is a view intermediate between the well known Fregean and Meinongian views, arguing for the possibility of two senses of “exists”: as first- and as second-order predicate. The object of this paper is to present this current of thought, and to evaluate it from the point of view of the history of ontology and of “continental” Thomism.

Publication details

Published in:

(2012) Ontologia analitica. Rivista di estetica 49.

Pages: 23-54

DOI: 10.4000/estetica.1669

Full citation:

Ventimiglia Giovanni (2012) „"To be" o "esse"? La questione dell'essere nel tomismo analitico“. Rivista di estetica 49, 23–54.