Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Series | Book | Chapter

147702

How mathematical foundation all but come about

a report on studies toward a phenomenological critique of Gödel's views on mathematical intuition

Robert S. Tragesser

pp. 195-213

Abstract

What follows is a report on fragments of studies aimed eventually at a thorough phenomenological investigation of Kurt Gödel's conviction that a form of intuition, not unlike perceptual intuition, plays an essential role in even highly infinitary mathematics. The studies are phenomenological in at least the senses that they attempt to take a microscopically close look at a wide range of purportedly mathematical intuitions, determining on this basis what makes them tick and what they are good for. In them I draw upon and extend Husserl's studies of the nature of such intuition (which he called "categorial intuition'). Indeed, Gödel himself praised them highly, albeit they stand in great need of improvement and development, but decidedly not in the direction of Husserl's late work, Experience and Judgment 2.

Publication details

Published in:

Seebohm Thomas M, Føllesdal Dagfinn, Mohanty Jithendra Nath (1991) Phenomenology and the formal sciences. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 195-213

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2580-2_13

Full citation:

Tragesser Robert S. (1991) „How mathematical foundation all but come about: a report on studies toward a phenomenological critique of Gödel's views on mathematical intuition“, In: T.M. Seebohm, D. Føllesdal & J.N. Mohanty (eds.), Phenomenology and the formal sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, 195–213.