Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Series | Book | Chapter

224406

Roman world, Egyptian earth

cognitive difference and empire in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra

Mary Thomas Crane

pp. 102-115

Abstract

Critics over the years have found many ways to read the binary division of Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra between the poles of Rome and Egypt.2 Recently, postcolonial theory has informed readings that emphasize the "Otherness' of Egypt: as John Gillies has argued, the ""orientalism" of Cleopatra's court — with its luxury, decadence, splendour, sensuality, appetite, effeminacy, and eunuchs — seems a systematic inversion of the legendary Roman values of temperance, manliness, courage, and pietas."3 However, as these critics usually acknowledge, the contrast between the two blurs upon closer inspection, since, as Gillies again puts it, "only from the vantage point of Egypt does Rome seem Roman."4

Publication details

Published in:

Gallagher Lowell, Raman Shankar (2010) Knowing Shakespeare: senses, embodiment and cognition. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Pages: 102-115

DOI: 10.1057/9780230299092_6

Full citation:

Thomas Crane Mary (2010) „Roman world, Egyptian earth: cognitive difference and empire in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra“, In: L. Gallagher & S. Raman (eds.), Knowing Shakespeare, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 102–115.