Book | Chapter
False prophets?
ontological conflicts and religion-making in an indonesian court
pp. 89-111
Abstract
This chapter examines a blasphemy trial on Lombok in 2010, in which a Muslim who claimed to have received revelations from the Angel Gabriel was charged with the offense of "insulting Islam" and accused of pretending to be a "false prophet". Probing the ontological conflicts involved in this case, the chapter argues that courts are important sites of contemporary "religion-making". Using this trial to show incommensurable worlds are being coproduced by courts and religious authorities, the chapter engages critically with anthropological positions that ontologize difference, suggesting that such approaches risk feeding into a violent politics of religious difference, being ill-suited for capturing the deep plurality within translocal religious traditions, such as Islam.
Publication details
Published in:
Enge Bertelsen Bjørn, Bendixsen Synnve (2016) Critical anthropological engagements in human alterity and difference. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Pages: 89-111
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40475-2_4
Full citation:
Telle Kari (2016) „False prophets?: ontological conflicts and religion-making in an indonesian court“, In: B. Enge bertelsen & S. Bendixsen (eds.), Critical anthropological engagements in human alterity and difference, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 89–111.