Philosophy, neuroscience and law
the conceptual and empirical, rule-following, interpretation and knowledge
pp. 177-188
Abstract
The intersection between law and neuroscience is one of the most-discussed subfields in legal scholarship. In this article, we consider fundamental issues in the field. These include: the distinction between the conceptual and the empirical, rule-following, and the nature of knowledge. We maintain that the conceptual issues are fundamental to all aspects of this enterprise.
Publication details
Published in:
Araszkiewicz Michał, Banaś Paweł, Gizbert-Studnicki Tomasz, Płeszka Krzysztof (2015) Problems of normativity, rules and rule-following. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 177-188
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09375-8_13
Full citation:
Patterson Dennis, Pardo Michael S. (2015) „Philosophy, neuroscience and law: the conceptual and empirical, rule-following, interpretation and knowledge“, In: M. Araszkiewicz, P. Banaś, T. Gizbert-Studnicki & K. Płeszka (eds.), Problems of normativity, rules and rule-following, Dordrecht, Springer, 177–188.