Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Book | Chapter

207440

Have the humanities always been digital?

for an understanding of the "digital humanities" in the context of originary technicity

Federica Frabetti

pp. 161-171

Abstract

This chapter is situated at the margins of what has become known as "digital humanities", that is, a discipline that applies computational methods of investigation to literary texts. Its aim is to suggest a new, somewhat different take on the relationship between the humanities and digitality by putting forward the following proposition: if the digital humanities encompass the study of software, writing and code, then they need to critically investigate the role of digitality in constituting the very concepts of the "humanities' and the human.In other words, I want to suggest that a deep understanding of the mutual coconstitution of technology and the human is needed as an essential part of any work undertaken within the digital humanities. I will draw on the concept of "originary technicity" (Stiegler 1998, 2009; Derrida 1976, 1994; Beardsworth 1995, 1996) and on my own recent research into software as a form of writing –research that can be considered part of the (also emerging) field of Software Studies/Code Studies – to demonstrate how a deconstructive reading of software and code can shed light on the mutual co-constitution of the digital and the human. I will also investigate what consequences such a reading can have –not just for the "humanities' and for media and cultural studies but also for the very concept of disciplinarity.

Publication details

Published in:

Berry David M. (2012) Understanding digital humanities. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Pages: 161-171

DOI: 10.1057/9780230371934_9

Full citation:

Frabetti Federica (2012) „Have the humanities always been digital?: for an understanding of the "digital humanities" in the context of originary technicity“, In: D. M. Berry (ed.), Understanding digital humanities, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 161–171.