Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Series | Book | Chapter

206941

Instead of erklären and verstehen

William James on human understanding

David E. Leary

pp. 121-140

Abstract

Perhaps more than any other American psychologist and philosopher, William James (1842-1910) was intimately familiar with contemporary European thought and debate, including the discussion of Erklären and Verstehen advanced by Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911) and others around the turn of the twentieth century. Even before this discussion was initiated, James had been dealing with related issues, pondering alternative solutions, and formulating his own original views on human understanding. These views coalesced in a distinctive approach to cognition. Fundamental to this approach was a belief in possibility and probability as innate features of the physical as well as mental manifestations of the universe. Also fundamental was a conviction that understanding is understanding, regardless of its viewpoint, object, or label as either "descriptive" or "explanatory."

Publication details

Published in:

Feest Uljana (2010) Historical perspectives on Erklären and Verstehen. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 121-140

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3540-0_7

Full citation:

Leary David E. (2010) „Instead of erklären and verstehen: William James on human understanding“, In: U. Feest (ed.), Historical perspectives on Erklären and Verstehen, Dordrecht, Springer, 121–140.