Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Series | Book | Chapter

205454

Comments

Shlomo Avineri

pp. 155-158

Abstract

Since I am very much in agreement with Professor Taylor about his general understanding of the importance of Hegel, and the importance of Hegel's conception of Sittlichkeit generally, I have decided to limit my remarks to the second part of his paper. This part attempts to understand the crisis of the modern democratic liberal bourgeois world in terms of the break-up of a traditional Sittlichkeit in Western societies. Here I am not in complete agreement.

Publication details

Published in:

Yovel Yirmiahu (1978) Philosophy of history and action: papers presented at the first Jerusalem philosophical encounter december 1974. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 155-158

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-9365-5_12

Full citation:

Avineri Shlomo (1978) „Comments“, In: Y. Yovel (ed.), Philosophy of history and action, Dordrecht, Springer, 155–158.