Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Book | Chapter

205426

Subject to interpretation

Rose Richards

pp. 163-174

Abstract

Autoethnography taught me a great deal about my embodied experience of chronic kidney disease, research as an embodied act, and my stance as a researcher. As a methodology, it has long proven useful for a variety of research fields, not the least education (Hayler, 2011; Sparkes, 1996; Starr, 2010). In South Africa, autoethnography has been used to interpret experiences in the changing landscape of higher education (Grossi, 2006; Harrison, 2009) because it offers researchers a number of possibilities concerning identity and transformation work, including problematising traditional categorisations and old hierarchies.

Publication details

Published in:

Pillay Daisy, Naicker Inbanathan, Pithouse-Morgan Kathleen (2016) Academic autoethnographies: inside teaching in higher education. Rotterdam, SensePublishers.

Pages: 163-174

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6300-399-5_11

Full citation:

Richards Rose (2016) „Subject to interpretation“, In: D. Pillay, I. Naicker & K. Pithouse-Morgan (eds.), Academic autoethnographies, Rotterdam, SensePublishers, 163–174.