Popper's continuing relevance
pp. 217-235
Abstract
Popper claims that error indicates what to avoid and there is no recipe for how to proceed. Most rationalist philosophers ignore his arguments and still try to justify their views instead of trying to improve upon them by criticizing them and conjecturing alternatives. In public discourse barren forms of justification are widespread. More and better critical institutions are required, and these require political compromise on shared aims.
Publication details
Published in:
Parusniková Zuzana, Cohen Robert S (2009) Rethinking Popper. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 217-235
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_17
Full citation:
Jarvie Ian (2009) „Popper's continuing relevance“, In: Z. Parusniková & R.S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper, Dordrecht, Springer, 217–235.