Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Series | Book | Chapter

193223

Humean perspectives on structural realism

Holger Lyre

pp. 381-397

Abstract

Structural Realism (SR) is a moderate variant of scientific realism and can roughly be captured by the idea that we should be committed to the structural rather than object-like content of our best current scientific theories. A quick view on the list of some of the main proponents shows that SR is basically a European philosophy of science movement (and just suits our ESF Programme): John Worrall, Ioannis Votsis, Steven French, Angelo Cei, James Ladyman, Simon Saunders, Michael Esfeld, Vincent Lam, Katherine Brading, Mauro Dorato, Dean Rickles, Fred Muller, and – exceptions prove the rule – Anjan Chakravartty and John Stachel. The list is of course not exhaustive, moreover, the debate has a broad periphery. A notable example of this is Bas van Fraassen's structural empiricism. The paper is a kind of opinionated review paper. In what follows I will pass through the most prevailing topics in recent debates over SR. My discussion will be organised, perhaps a bit unorthodoxly, in short sections, here and then I will outline my own views.

Publication details

Published in:

Stadler Friedrich (2010) The present situation in the philosophy of science. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 381-397

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_27

Full citation:

Lyre Holger (2010) „Humean perspectives on structural realism“, In: F. Stadler (ed.), The present situation in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer, 381–397.