Book | Chapter
W. v. Quine and N. Goodman
pp. 127-160
Abstract
For Quine and Goodman the distinction between names that name something and so-called syncategorematic signs, is of special importance. In order to answer the question "How and what do predicate signs represent?" in their sense, we must first know whether predicate signs are genuine names or merely syncategorematic words. As we shall see, Quine has found a criterion that indicates precisely which words the user of a frege-russellian language regards as genuine names: they are those words in respect of which quantification is permitted; i.e., those that name an object in the value-range of the variables.
Publication details
Published in:
Küng Guido (1967) Ontology and the logistic analysis of language: an enquiry into the contemporary views on universals. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 127-160
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-3514-9_10
Full citation:
Küng Guido (1967) W. v. Quine and N. Goodman, In: Ontology and the logistic analysis of language, Dordrecht, Springer, 127–160.