Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Book | Chapter

185430

Autonomy and the problem of suffering

tragedy and transcendence in psychoanalytic discourse

Suzanne R. Kirschner

pp. 181-198

Abstract

Scholars have long attempted to place autonomy in context, demonstrating that the autonomous person has been produced in particular sociohistorical (Mauss, 1985; Taylor, 1989; Cushman, 1990) and cultural (Weber, 1958; Doi, 1973; Gaines, 1982; Bellah et al., 1985; Dumont, 1986; Kurtz, 1992) environments. Some theorists have also found him to be, to some degree, a gender specific type (Chodorow, 1979; Gilligan, 1982). Still other scholars go so far as to assert that the autonomous person may not even exist, that he is a modern European invention in an even more radical sense — that of being fabricated, a lie, an illusion (Gergen, 1991, 1994).

Publication details

Published in:

Chung Man, Feltham Colin (2003) Psychoanalytic knowledge. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 181-198

DOI: 10.1057/9780230001152_10

Full citation:

Kirschner Suzanne R. (2003) „Autonomy and the problem of suffering: tragedy and transcendence in psychoanalytic discourse“, In: M. Chung & C. Feltham (eds.), Psychoanalytic knowledge, Dordrecht, Springer, 181–198.