Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Book | Chapter

184874

Habsburg positivism

the politics of positive knowledge in imperial and post-imperial austria, 1804–1938

Johannes Feichtinger

pp. 191-238

Abstract

In the Habsburg lands "positive knowledge" served as the key framework of liberal science from the 1830s because it permitted its practitioners to trace ineluctable social-political progress. In the 1850s Mill's version of positivism was translated to the Austrian lands by the classicist Theodor Gomperz. In this chapter traces the rival varieties of positivism across scientific domains (the natural sciences, philology, philosophy, history, law). It demonstrates how Mill's model of inquiry was refashioned by Ernst Mach and Franz Brentano, by the Vienna Circle (Schlick, Carnap, Neurath), as well as by Hans Kelsen's critical-democratic legal positivism. The final section analyzes the fin de siècle shipwreck of positivism in conjunction with the collapse of Austrian liberalism whose vision of benign imperial rule, society, and scientific inquiry it had provided.

Publication details

Published in:

Feichtinger Johannes, Fillafer Franz L. , Surman Jan (2018) The worlds of positivism: a global intellectual history, 1770–1930. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 191-238

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65762-2_8

Full citation:

Feichtinger Johannes (2018) „Habsburg positivism: the politics of positive knowledge in imperial and post-imperial austria, 1804–1938“, In: J. Feichtinger, F. Fillafer & J. Surman (eds.), The worlds of positivism, Dordrecht, Springer, 191–238.