Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Book | Chapter

181989

Six meanings of the history of science

the case of psychology

Aaro Toomela

pp. 47-73

Abstract

History is commonly described in many scientific texts. Yet it is often not clear why. In this chapter, six reasons for studying history of a science are distinguished. On the one hand, there are three kinds of history use which reflect identity building on the part of the author rather than any contribution to the content of scientific knowledge. These uses of history are either neutral or hinder the progress of science. On the other hand, three kinds of studies of the history of science are distinguished that are essential for the development of scientific knowledge. In the last part of the chapter, the idea of scientific progress is discussed, and it is shown that only historical science can be progressive. Ahistorical science, which usually uses history only for identity building, becomes noncumulative and fragmented and increasingly ceases to be science.

Publication details

Published in:

Hroar Klempe Sven, Smith Roger (2016) Centrality of history for theory construction in psychology. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 47-73

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42760-7_3

Full citation:

Toomela Aaro (2016) „Six meanings of the history of science: the case of psychology“, In: S. Hroar klempe & R. Smith (eds.), Centrality of history for theory construction in psychology, Dordrecht, Springer, 47–73.