Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Book | Chapter

179165

Chaitin, Leibniz and complexity

Herbert Breger

pp. 257-265

Abstract

Let me begin with a general remark on Leibniz's reputation. If one wants to set down clearly an outcome of the priority dispute between Newton und Leibniz, independent of national differences, then one has presumably to concede that Leibniz was the loser, at least inasmuch as his adherents had to defend him constantly in the 18th und 19th centuries. Even in Germany the reputed historian of mathematics Moritz Cantor assumed that Leibniz had tried to forge the date of one of his documents in infinitesimal calculus [Cantor 1901, 182–183].

Publication details

Published in:

Chin Drian Yannick, Krömer Ralf (2012) New essays on Leibniz reception: in science and philosophy of science 1800-2000. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 257-265

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0346-0504-5_12

Full citation:

Breger Herbert (2012) „Chaitin, Leibniz and complexity“, In: Y. Chin Drian & R. Krömer (eds.), New essays on Leibniz reception, Dordrecht, Springer, 257–265.