Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Journal | Volume | Article

167087

Actuality and intelligibility

Hegel and peirce on experience vis-à-vis reason

Vincent Colapietro

pp. n/a

Abstract

Expressed in terms of his categories, Peirce criticized Hegel for having overlooked secondness, “not mere twoness [or duality] but active oppugnancy” (CP 8.291; emphasis omitted), “the sense of shock,” surprise, and especially struggle and conflict (CP 5.45). In particular, he judged his predecessor harshly for having neglected or, at least, downplayed the role secondness, especially in the form of experience, plays in the growth of knowledge. In Peirce’s judgment, then, Hegel’s emphasis on thirdness (mediation, conciliation, integration, and the overcoming of estrangement) tended to eclipse secondness (otherness, opposition, conflict, clash, and direct encounters with irreducible otherness). If one considers what Hegel actually wrote about both experience vis-à-vis reason and, more generally, the role of conflict in the generation of knowledge and indeed of much else, Peirce’s criticism hardly seems fair. My proximate purpose is, however, not so much to defend Hegel’s thought against Peirce’s charge as to show how close Hegel and Peirce are in their understanding of the relationship between experience and reason. Beyond this, my ultimate objective is to illuminate this relationship, by consideration of the nuanced, subtle manner in which these thinkers construe this relationship. That is, my main purpose is not hermeneutic or historical but philosophical. Becoming clearer about how Peirce stands to Hegel is not nearly as important as becoming clearer about how experience stands to reason. As it turns out, however, a philological comparison facilitates our philosophical task.

Publication details

Published in:

(2018) Pragmatism and idealism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 10 (2).

DOI: 10.4000/ejpap.1311

Full citation:

Colapietro Vincent (2018) „Actuality and intelligibility: Hegel and peirce on experience vis-à-vis reason“. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 10 (2), n/a.