Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Journal | Volume | Article

142902

Neural representationalism, the hard problem of content and vitiated verdicts

a reply to Hutto & Myin (2013)

Matteo Colombo

pp. 257-274

Abstract

Colombo's (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2013) plea for neural representationalism is the focus of a recent contribution to Phenomenology and Cognitive Science by Daniel D. Hutto and Erik Myin. In that paper, Hutto and Myin have tried to show that my arguments fail badly. Here, I want to respond to their critique clarifying the type of neural representationalism put forward in my (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2013) piece, and to take the opportunity to make a few remarks of general interest concerning what Hutto and Myin have dubbed "the Hard Problem of Content."

Publication details

Published in:

(2014) Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2).

Pages: 257-274

DOI: 10.1007/s11097-014-9350-6

Full citation:

Colombo Matteo (2014) „Neural representationalism, the hard problem of content and vitiated verdicts: a reply to Hutto & Myin (2013)“. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2), 257–274.