Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Journal | Volume | Article

137533

A qualified defense of Husserl's crisis concepts

Kenneth Knies

pp. 27-47

Abstract

Husserl’s reflections on the European crisis appear philosophically confused and politically counterproductive. After acknowledging this appearance, I make a case for their continued philosophical and political importance. I attempt to resolve philosophical confusion by clarifying the attitude that addresses the crisis as the ‘attitude of the phenomenologist’ and distinguishing this from the phenomenological attitude. The former contends with problems pertaining to phenomenology as a cultural structure. I show how Husserl’s conception of a ‘European crisis’ results from confronting one such problem. After outlining what Husserl means by ‘Europe,’ I assess the relevance of the concept to the critique of Western imperialism. I argue that Husserl’s program of Europeanization opposes ethnocentrism and cultural imperialism, but remains within the framework of an unwarranted European exceptionalism. I suggest that the political and historical concepts central to Husserl’s engagement with the crisis problematic need not determine the problematic itself, which deserves further thinking through.

Publication details

Published in:

Tava Francesco, Caminada Emanuele (2016). Facing global crisis after Europe. Metodo 4 (1).

Pages: 27-47

DOI: 10.19079/metodo.4.1.27

Full citation:

Knies Kenneth (2016). A qualified defense of Husserl's crisis concepts. Metodo 4 (1), pp. 27-47.