Metodo

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Series | Book | Chapter

122529

Imagination and passivity Husserl and Kant

A cross-relationship

Natalie Depraz

pp. 29-56

Abstract

Heidegger’s interpretation of the Kantian imagination is well-known: it has often been commented on2. By underlining the central character of the schematism in the Critique of Pure Reason and choosing to emphasize the first Transcendental Deduction which highlights imagination rather than understanding, Heidegger gave the critical imagination a leading-role within the fundamental ontology he had just begun to build at that time. In short, he endowed imagination with the meaning of an ungrounded ground (Abgrund).

Publication details

Published in:

Depraz Natalie, Zahavi Dan (1998) Alterity and facticity: New perspectives on Husserl. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

Pages: 29-56

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5064-4_2

Full citation:

Depraz Natalie (1998) „Imagination and passivity Husserl and Kant: A cross-relationship“, In: N. Depraz & D. Zahavi (eds.), Alterity and facticity, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 29–56.