Wolfgang Spohn
Defeasible normative reasoning
2020
Synthese 197/4
2018
Synthese 195/9
2016
in: Readings in formal epistemology, Dordrecht : Springer
How essentialism properly understood might reconcile realism and social constructivism
2014
in: New directions in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht : Springer
Reversing 30 years of discussion
2012
Synthese 187/1
Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences
2011
in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Dordrecht : Springer
Multiple contraction revisited
2010
in: Epsa epistemology and methodology of science, Dordrecht : Springer
Laws are persistent inductive schemes
2004
in: Induction and deduction in the sciences, Dordrecht : Springer
Carnap versus Quine, or aprioristic versus naturalized epistemology, or a lesson from dispositions
2003
in: Language, truth and knowledge, Dordrecht : Springer
A brief comparison of Pollock's defeasible reasoning and ranking functions
2002
Synthese 131/1
1991
in: Existence and explanation, Dordrecht : Springer
